Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 188/189
Border/Tradition/Thiel: Old: in Aristotle the border always has a dimension smaller by 1 than the object itself. A point can then no longer have a boundary! It follows from this that the points do not touch each other, and consequently cannot form a continuum!
For Aristotle, therefore, a straight line cannot consist of points. It is not a set of points in the sense of pre-aristotelian or post-aristotelian mathematics. A straight line or a line is a continuum insofar as it is divisible as often as desired, but the parts and thus also their boundaries, the points are always only potentially present "in" such a continuum.
Only the two end points of a route belong to it as "actual" real points, all others are only "potential".
I 190
New: Topology: one point p of a set M means one
Def Accumulation point of M, if in each environment of p there is another point of the set M, and the set M is called
Def completed when all their cluster points are contained in M itself. A set of M means
Def coherent, if it cannot be divided in any way into two parts A and B in such a way that they together form M, but have no point in common, and none contains an accumulation point of the other.
Def Continuum: a set that is both closed and coherent is called a continuum.
Def dense: for every two points there is another point in between.
I 191
Accumulation point: We return to the interval 0,1, .... no point of L can lie to the right of d any more.
Then we can choose such a small environment U that ((s) a certain, chosen point) e no longer lies in U, because according to the definition of the accumulation point in every environment of d lies a point of R .
Nevertheless, there must be a point p from R in U and therefore p < e must apply.
However, this contradicts the assumed property of decomposition that every point of L is to the left of every point of R and that e < p must be valid.
This shows that this accumulation point of R, situated in L, is unambiguously determined, because one of two different points with this property should lie to the right of the other, and since both should lie in L, the same contradiction would arise as between d and e.
The point d is thus the "largest" i.e. the extreme right point of L.
>Real numbers.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.