Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
I 301
Def Scale Invariance/Thiel: Shape equality of all distances. Because of the scale invariance, the size statements of the geometry are always only those about proportions. But these have to be defined first with a form-theoretical approach. Especially the equality of size.
(FregeVs: first equality, then number).
Since we could explain geometric shape equality only after the determination of excellent shapes in protogeometry, the fitting equality does not provide the size equality (congruence) required in shape-theoretical geometry.
This can be defined differently, e.g. for distances by the possibility of connecting both by a sequence of symmetrical triangles.
>Self-similarity, >Congruence,

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.