Lexicon of Arguments

Philosophical and Scientific Issues in Dispute
 
[german]


Complaints - Corrections

Table
Concepts
Versus
Sc. Camps
Theses I
Theses II

Concept/Author*  

What is wrong?
Page
Other metadata
Translation
Excerpt or content
Other

Correction: Year / Place / Page
/ /

Correction:
(max 500 charact.)

Your username*
or User-ID

Email address*

The complaint
will not be published.

 
Berka I187
Operational logic/dialogical/Lorenzen/Berka: Variant of the constructivist interpretation of intuitionism.
>Intuitionism, >Dialogical Logic.
Functors and quantifiers are constructively defined with regard to a dialogue game.
>Functors, >Quantifiers.
Truth-functions: can then be proved as sentences about the dialogic use of the functions.
>Truth functions.
I 188
N.B.: the successful defense of a formula in dialogue is not sufficient to prove the effective logical truth (logical validity) of this formula. For this proof it must be shown that the formula can be successfully defended against any possible strategy of the opponent.
>Proofs, >Provability, >Validity, >Universal validity, >Logical formula.
---
Thiel I 103
Logic/Lorenzen: It was only in the sixties that a construction of logic was developed, which can also be described as a justification in scientific theory and in a philosophical sense.
It provides a possibility, not yet seen, for the justification of both the classical and the constructive concept of the "validity" of logical propositions.
(Lorenzens' "dialogical logic" with proponent and opponent, also "argumentation-theoretical structure of logic").
It is supposed to show that the axiomatic derivation does not constitute the whole meaning of the proof, but that a proof should provide reasons for the truth or validity of the proved proposition. .. + .. I 105.
>Axioms, >Derivation, >Derivability.

Found an error? Use our Complaint Form. Perhaps someone forgot to close a bracket? A page number is wrong?
Help us to improve our lexicon.
However, if you are of a different opinion, as regards the validity of the argument, post your own argument beside the contested one.
The correction will be sent to the contributor of the original entry to get his opinion about.