|Analogy: formal parallelism. Intends show that from a similar case, similar conclusions can be drawn.|
Books on Amazon
|Analogies||Strawson V 102
Analogies of Experience/Kant: We do not find them in the axioms of intuition -
"Experiences are only possible with the idea of a necessary connection of perceptions" - Transcendental Aesthetic/Kant: Principles of sensibility a priori - Transcendental Analytic: comprises the deduction of the categories, the schematism and the principles.
Analogy: Shows how the order of the perceptions must be represented with the terms - Kant brilliantly reduces it on temporal relations - 1. between the objects 2. between the experiences.
Stra V 105
1. Analogy/Kant: Quantum of substance in nature can be neither reduced nor increased.
Time/Kant: All determination of time presupposes something permanent. Only space is persistent.
StrawsonVsKant: That is not a reason for the objective order to be spatial.
StrawsonVsKant: There is no need for a conservation principle! Only a re-identification principle for loci (objects). - Nowadays: We see that something burns while no substance remains.
Stra V 112
2./3. Analogy/Kant: Question: Could perceptions also have occurred reversely? a) Events: No time indifference b) Object: Time difference
2. Analogy: The order of the sequence is not only necessary, but also specific, bound by our apprehensions. Causality: If the order is necessary, the change itself is necessary. StrawsonvsKant: He unconsciously uses two terms of necessity here: conceptual/causal
Stra V 116/117
3. Analogy/Kant: the interaction of simultaneously existing objects corresponds to a time indifference of perceptions- Strawson: unlike causality.
I Günter Schulte Kant Einführung (Campus) Frankfurt 1994
Externe Quellen. ZEIT-Artikel 11/02 (Ludger Heidbrink über Rawls)
Volker Gerhard "Die Frucht der Freiheit" Plädoyer für die Stammzellforschung ZEIT 27.11.03
Einzelding und logisches Subjekt Stuttgart 1972
Analyse und Metaphysik München 1994
Die Grenzen des Sinns Frankfurt 1981