Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
A priori: something that we can know without prior (empirical) investigation. Is the inventory of a priori certainties purely logical? Is a priori knowledge always necessary?
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
 
Books on Amazon
A priori IL 96
A Priori/Wittgenstein: that would have to be a set whose meaning guaranteed its truth - but the meaning requires that we verify the sentence - ((s) verificationism: can then not accept analytic truths).
---
II 96/97
A Priori/Wittgenstein: expressions that look a priori must be explained - the same expression can be a sentence or a hypothesis - thus, the same expression may be equation or hypothesis - equation: necessary - in visual space, it is a priori that an equilateral triangle is equiangular - you cannot see one without seeing the other - physical space: here not a priori, because the triangle may be inclined.
---
II 98
A Priori/Seeming/Appearing/Wittgenstein: "This chair looks green" here, our certainty is of logical nature and a priori.
---
III 233
A Priori/Necessity/Wittgenstein/Late/Pile: he does not concede the a priori grammatical sentences a form of absolute necessity.

W II
L. Wittgenstein
Vorlesungen 1930-35 Frankfurt 1989

W III
L. Wittgenstein
Das Blaue Buch - Eine Philosophische Betrachtung Frankfurt 1984

W IV
L. Wittgenstein
Tractatus Logico Philosophicus Frankfurt/M 1960


> Counter arguments against Wittgenstein
> Counter arguments in relation to A priori



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-26