Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Equivalence: Relation between sentences. It exists if both sides have the same truth value, so that they are both true or both false.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Kripke, Saul Aaron
 
Books on Amazon
Equivalence EMD II 371
Logically equivalent/Kripke: are the results even if it makes a difference in what order multiple descriptions are eliminated - Russell: not equivalent: (Ey)((x)(y = x ↔ f(x)) u Cc(y)) and C((Ey)(x)(y = x ↔ f(x)) u c(y))) - (C= "believe")).
---
II 379
Logically equivalent are the following: E.g. P u P and P v P and (E.g.)(Ey) (Fx u Fy) and (Ex)(Ey) (Fx v Fy), although conjunction and disjunction are not equivalent.
---
EMD II 379
Logically equivalent/Kripke: P u P and P v P and (Ex)(Ey) (Fx u Fy) and (Ex)(Ey) (Fx v Fy) although conjunction and disjunction are not equivalent.

K I
S.A. Kripke
Name und Notwendigkeit Frankfurt 1981

K III
S. A. Kripke
Outline of a Theory of Truth (1975)
In
Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, R. L. Martin (Hg), Oxford/NY 1984

EMD II
G. Evans/J. McDowell
Truth and Meaning Oxford 1977

Ev I
G. Evans
The Varieties of Reference (Clarendon Paperbacks) Oxford 1989


> Counter arguments against Kripke
> Counter arguments in relation to Equivalence



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-28