Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Attributive/referential: difference in reference - attributive "whoever it is" (may not be identified) - referential the identified object.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Kripke, Saul Aaron
 
Books on Amazon
Attributive/referential Wolf II 209
KripkeVsDonnellan: his theory is correct, but does not refute Russell's (better, because more consistent) theory - Distinction referential/attributive has nothing to do with distinction de re/de dicto (Donnellan ditto).
---
Wolf II 236f
Referential/attriutive/KripkeVsDonnellan: distinction speaker reference/semantic reference is needed anyway, it is sufficient instead of distinction referential/attributive - E.g. The real husband is irrelevant. - I do not need to have confused two people - I just believe that a person has a property that it lacks in reality.
---
Wolf II 222
E.g. "her husband is kind to her"/Linsky/Kripke: Problem with the statement: is it true? The use cannot be analyzed here, only the meanings of the sentence. - In referential use it is unclear what is meant by "statement".

K I
S.A. Kripke
Name und Notwendigkeit Frankfurt 1981

K III
S. A. Kripke
Outline of a Theory of Truth (1975)
In
Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, R. L. Martin (Hg), Oxford/NY 1984

K II siehe Wol I
U. Wolf (Hg)
Eigennamen Frankfurt 1993


> Counter arguments against Kripke



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-31