Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Chinese Room: thought experiment by J.R. Searle - in a locked room sits a man who does not understand Chinese and translates notes that are slipped through under the door into Chinese with the help of a book with instructions. The discussion is about whether one can describe the system as a whole as an understanding system.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Danto, Arthur C.
 
Books on Amazon:
Arthur Danto
Chinese Room I 271 ff
Searle: denies that in terms of linguistic skills no distinction should be possible. Chinese room: the occupant does not speak the language, but acts according to established rules. The output is indistinguishable from language skills.
DantoVsSearle: but perhaps the brain does not do anything else, but answer to an electrical pulse with a electrical reaction.

Dt VII
A. C. Danto
The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art (Columbia Classics in Philosophy) New York 2005


> Counter arguments against Danto
> Counter arguments in relation to Chinese Room



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-23