Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Covering laws: general statements of law which, together with empirical conditions within the so-called deductive-nomological model (according to Hempel and Oppenheim) form the premises from which causal explanations can be obtained. See also explanation, causal explanation.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Cartwright, Nancy
 
Books on Amazon
Covering Laws I 17
covering law: thesis: there is a single correct explanation for each phenomenon. - CartwrightVscovering law - all Vscovering Law: does not correctly describe the causes
I 44
Def covering law model / Hempel / Cartwright: assumes that we need to know all the natural laws, and a little logic and possibly probability theory. Then we know what factors explain what other factors - I 45: many authors Vs: allows for too much - e.g. Henry is not pregnant because he takes birth control pills - E.x. Barometer explains storm.

Car I
N. Cartwright
How the laws of physics lie Oxford New York 1983


> Counter arguments against Cartwright
> Counter arguments in relation to Covering Laws



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-30