Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Covering laws: general statements of law which, together with empirical conditions within the so-called deductive-nomological model (according to Hempel and Oppenheim) form the premises from which causal explanations can be obtained. See also explanation, causal explanation.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Lewis, David
Books on Amazon
Covering Laws V 239
Statement/covering law/deductive-nomological/Railton/Lewis: Conclusion: the difference to my model is small - not only DN-models are correct explanations - but they are a way - an explanatory speaker must argue for what he believes - laws : are important in the causation and thus for the explanation - LewisVsRailton: covering laws are not part of the explanatory information.

D. Lewis
Die Identität von Körper und Geist Frankfurt 1989

D. Lewis
Konventionen Berlin 1975

D. Lewis
Philosophical Papers Bd I New York Oxford 1983

D. Lewis
Philosophical Papers Bd II New York Oxford 1986

LwCl I
Cl. I. Lewis
Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge (Dover Books on Western Philosophy) 1991

> Counter arguments against Lewis
> Counter arguments in relation to Covering Laws

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX file
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-04-23