|Thesis: everyday language and its use in critical in questions of meaning, etc.|
Books on Amazon
|Thinking||I 93 ff
DummettVsFrege: his theory of perception contradicts his thesis that every human can only grasp those thoughts which he understands as the sense of sentences. There are two interpretations.
Thoughts/DummettVsFrege: not necessarily linguistic: Proto-thoughts (also animals) (associated with activity) - Proto-thoughts instead of Husserl s noema.
I 137 f
Strongest interpretation: we can only think in language -
weakest interpretation: none of us can have a thought that we cannot express.
DummettVsQuine, VsDavidson: not idiolect, but common language prevails.
Language/thinking/Wittgenstein/Dummett: the role of language as a vehicle of thought is subordinate to its role as a tool of communication.
Ursprünge der analytischen Philosophie Frankfurt 1992
Wahrheit Stuttgart 1982