Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Quine, Two Dogmas of Empricism:
1st Dogma distinction analytic/synthetic - 2nd Dogma reductionism. The belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to a logical construction of terms which refer to immediate experience. - Quine, W.V.O. (1951), "Two Dogmas of Empiricism," The Philosophical Review 60, 20–43. Reprinted in his 1953 From a Logical Point of View. Harvard University Press. See also analytic/synthetic, reduction, reductionism, conceptual schemes, holism. Later D. Davidson discussed a 3rd dogma (separation scheme/content).
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Sellars, Wilfrid
 
Books on Amazon
Two Dogmas I XXXIV
Quine / Two Dogmas: Criticism of "obscure intermediary entities." - analog with Wittgenstein: we do not stop with our words somewhere before the facts but think that such and such is so and so.

Sell I
W. Sellars
Der Empirismus und die Philosophie des Geistes Paderborn 1999


> Counter arguments against Sellars



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-22