Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Epistemology, philosophy: examines the conditions for the emergence of knowledge and the basis for justification and confirmation. Epistemology cannot explain special cases in which someone who has less information may give more correct answers. See also knowledge, theory, justification, confirmation, reliability.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Searle, John R.
 
Books on Amazon
Epistemology III 184
Thing in itself SearleVsKant: from the fact that we cannot see it, it does not follow that it is different from what we perceive, and not that there is a different kind of reality. In particular, from the positioning within our cognitive system it does not follow that this knowledge could never be the knowledge of an independent reality. (independend from our knowledge).
---
III 194
Background: Moore's hands belong to the background. They are not in a safe deposit box - the background helps us determine the truth conditions for our utterances.

S I
J. R. Searle
Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes Frankfurt 1996

S II
J.R. Searle
Intentionalität Frankfurt 1991

S III
J. R. Searle
Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit Hamburg 1997

S IV
J.R. Searle
Ausdruck und Bedeutung Frankfurt 1982

S V
J. R. Searle
Sprechakte Frankfurt 1983


> Counter arguments against Searle
> Counter arguments in relation to Epistemology



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-31