Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
General validity: within a calculus a formula that is satisfied by any interpretation (variable assignment with expressions for objects) is valid. See also satisfaction, satisfiability, interpretation.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Searle, John R.
 
Books on Amazon
Validity V 201
Validity/Urmson: "valid" is a value expression 1. Therefore, it cannot be re-defined descriptively - 2. from the description of a deductive conclusion cannot be shown that it is valid - fallacy of criticism of naturalistic fallacy of assertiveness/SearleVsUrmson: wrong to assume that it is logically impossible to derive a value statement of descriptive expressions - solution: therefore, by saying that a conclusion is deductive, the criteria for its validity have already been established (that the conclusion follows from the premises - this is a special case: here no logical gap between importance of a value expression and application criteria.

S I
J. R. Searle
Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes Frankfurt 1996

S II
J.R. Searle
Intentionalität Frankfurt 1991

S III
J. R. Searle
Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit Hamburg 1997

S IV
J.R. Searle
Ausdruck und Bedeutung Frankfurt 1982

S V
J. R. Searle
Sprechakte Frankfurt 1983


> Counter arguments against Searle



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-29