Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Shoemaker, Sydney
 
Books on Amazon
I, Ego, Self Frank I 50ff
ShoemakerVsHume: 1st shows no more than that, as I find myself, I can not know - the second premise is false: although there is no index-free description, that does not prove that I would need such - for identification the possibility of errors is necessary - but this is not given in the case of the self - anyway regress in self-identification - Hume did not deny self-consciousness / Shoemaker: no kind of perception! (Rorty ditto) - Pain: no (private) object, a person is not pain, and it is not painful, but one feels pain.

Shoem I
S. Shoemaker
Identity, Cause, and Mind: Philosophical Essays Expanded Edition 2003

Fra I
M. Frank (Hrsg.)
Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewusstseins Frankfurt 1994


> Counter arguments against Shoemaker



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-27