Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Simons, Peter
 
Books on Amazon
Identity Chisholm II 171
Identity/Simons: Thesis: differentiated objects may well have all parts in common: E.g. I and my body (ChisholmVs).
---
Simons I 113
Identity/individual/whole/part/whole/extensional mereology/RescherVsExtensionality: (Rescher 1955): the extensional property that involves that whole are identical if they have the same parts, excludes those part-whole relations, in which the organization (organization, (s) internal structure) is involved - e.g. different sentences can consist of the same sentences - two I) and must not be identical if they have the same parts. - E.g. building committee = Personnel Committee - E.g. family Robinso = basketball team Robinson - E.g. Person/its body - N.B.: this is not about relations among themselves.
---
I 180
Definition coincidence/continuants/Simons: coincidence predicate: CTD5 a <

Si I
P. Simons
Parts Oxford New York 1987

Chi I
R. Chisholm
Die erste Person Frankfurt 1992

Chi III
Roderick M. Chisholm
Erkenntnistheorie Graz 2004


> Counter arguments against Simons
> Counter arguments in relation to Identity



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-24