Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Brandom, Robert
Books on Amazon
Intersubjectivity I 823
BrandomVs I-We conceptions of social practices: they do not meet the adequacy condition. They base a distinction between what individuals deem to be correct use and the actually correct use on the comparison of the views of individuals and society. (VsInter-subjectivity)
This is the usual way of treating objectivity as inter-subjectivity.
I 831
I-You style: the definitions are made by an individual (account holder), not by "the community". (definition is more than mere regularity) .

VsIntersubjectivity (I-We style) it is faulty, because it is unable to grant the possibility of error on the part of the privileged perspective.
I 832
I-You conception of intersubjectivity: no perspective is privileged. Perspective form instead of cross-perspective content.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begr√ľnden und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Brandom
> Counter arguments in relation to Intersubjectivity

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX file
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-04-30