Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Wright, Crispin
 
Books on Amazon
Counterfactual Conditionals I 154
WrightVsCounterfactual Conditionals: E.g. a chameleon sits in the dark on a green billiards table: it cannot a priori apply that the truth conditions for the corresponding sentence are covered by the statement to be analyzed - (Conditional Fallacy) - Wright: but we are keen on an equivalence (projectivist?) that can be valid a priori. - Solution: provisional equation: e.g. chameleon: could not have happened if we had determined that it was about its color under standard conditions and with a standard observer - provisional equation: If competing statement, then (it would be the case that P iff would S judged that p) (competing statement: no alternative circumstances for competing statement) - provisional equation: at best true a posteriori - loss of universality, no statement about of non-standard conditions.

Wri I
Cr. Wright
Wahrheit und Objektivität Frankfurt 2001


> Counter arguments against Wright
> Counter arguments in relation to Counterfactual Conditionals



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-25