Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Competence, philosophy, language philosophy: competence is the ability to handle specific tasks. This ability can affect the knowledge of sentences or the application of rules. It is disputed which competencies are innate for the application of rules. The antonym to language competence is language performance._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
M.J. Cresswell on Competence - Dictionary of Arguments
I 2 Language skills/semantic competence/Cresswell: the ability to distinguish between truth concitions and falsity conditions. - We can identify truth conditions with possible worlds. >Truth conditions, >Possible worlds, >Understanding. I 16 Skills can be tested only in the actual world of the speaker (not = our actual world). >Actual world, >Actuality, cf. >Actualism._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Cr I M. J. Cresswell Semantical Essays (Possible worlds and their rivals) Dordrecht Boston 1988 Cr II M. J. Cresswell Structured Meanings Cambridge Mass. 1984 |
||
> Counter arguments against Cresswell
> Counter arguments in relation to Competence
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-19