Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Compositionality, linguistics, language philosophy: the thesis (originally by G. Frege, Grundlagen der Arithmetik, 1884) that the meaning of composite expressions, e.g. sentences, results from the meanings of the parts. It follows that a change of the parts, e.g. replacement of a single word by another, can change the meaning of the entire composite structure. See also Frege principle._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Chr. Peacocke on Compositionality - Dictionary of Arguments
II 176 Compositionality/Peackocke: Idioms are not explained in terms of components along with psychological facts about English people. >Explanation, >Sentences, >Meaning, >Compositionality, >Frege Principle. Not a "theory around" (with individual axioms for individual cases). Instead: conventions. >Language use, >Theories, cf. >Use theory of meaning._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Peacocke I Chr. R. Peacocke Sense and Content Oxford 1983 Peacocke II Christopher Peacocke "Truth Definitions and Actual Languges" In Truth and Meaning, G. Evans/J. McDowell, Oxford 1976 |
||
> Counter arguments against Peacocke
> Counter arguments in relation to Compositionality
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-16