Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Def: truth as correspondence with objects in the world. See also mapping relation, representation.
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Field, Hartry
Books on Amazon
Correspondence Theory I 229
Correspondence Theory/Truth/Field: needs an additional concept of the truth theoretical content of psychological states. - And it is used in a way that it cannot occur in the disquotation scheme.
I 250
Correspondence Theory/FieldVsCorrespondence Theory: even for an inconsistent theory it is consistent when the the correspondence theory is assumed that it is true, because the logical words in it could have been used differently. - Therefore, the truth of the correspondence theory should not be applied to disquotational truth, because it is a logical concept itself and the instances of disquotation scheme must be regarded as logical truths.
II 199
Correspondence Theory/Ontological Commitment/O.C./Quine/Field: the ontological commitment seems to exclude the correspondence theory. - FieldVsQuine: despite the uncertainty we should allow correspondence. - >partial denotation.
Horwich I 416
VsCorrespondence: which one is the right one? - Field: which one is relevant may depend on epistemic values, but not on which values ​​are "correct." - Field pro "epistemic relativism".
I 419
RelativismVsSkepticism: the question of the "real" justification does not make sense.

Fie I
H. Field
Realism, Mathematics and Modality Oxford New York 1989

Fie II
H. Field
Truth and the Absence of Fact Oxford New York 2001

H. Field
Science without numbers Princeton New Jersey 1980

Hor I
P. Horwich (Ed.)
Theories of Truth Aldershot 1994

> Counter arguments against Field
> Counter arguments in relation to Correspondence Theory

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX file
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-04-29