|Def: truth as correspondence with objects in the world. See also mapping relation, representation.|
Books on Amazon:
|Correspondence Theory||I 255
Conformance/correspondence/Ryle: instead simply: he sees it. - FodorVs: recognition is more complex and abstract, because surprisingly independent of differences.
Correspondence: can also mean something like relationship in general, does not have to be congruent.
Objective: ambiguous: a) conception that everyone would reach
b) things as they really are.
PragmatismVsCorrespondence theory: the correspondence theory must be abandoned if one wants to recognize a language as privileged for representation. Otherwise, there would be no distinction between intellect and imagination, between clear and confused ideas.
RortyVsCorrespondence theory: misleading: it could be judged on the basis of non-words, which words are appropriate for the world.
Conformance/correspondence/absolute/RortyVsIdealism: accordance with the absolute - with this he robbed the term of its actual core.
Correspondence Theory/Rorty: this phrase only says that the correspondence theorist needs criteria for the appropriateness of vocabularies. He needs the notion that one somehow "clings" better to reality than the other.
Rorty: the assertion that some vocabularies work better than others is perfectly fine, but not that they represent the reality in a more appropriate way!
- - -
Horwich I 452
Correspondence/IdealismVsCorrespondence theory//Rorty: thesis: there is no correspondence between a conviction and non-conviction (object).
Der Spiegel der Natur Frankfurt 1997
Philosophie & die Zukunft Frankfurt 2000
Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität Frankfurt 1992
Eine Kultur ohne Zentrum Stuttgart 1993
Solidarität oder Objektivität? Stuttgart 1998
Wahrheit und Fortschritt Frankfurt 2000
P. Horwich (Ed.)
Theories of Truth Aldershot 1994