Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Armstrong, D.M.
 
Books on Amazon
Forces III 122
Forces / Ontology / Armstrong: forces would be non-categorical universals along with categorical and particulars - too complex ontology - ((s) "non-categorical" because of the bearer?) - Armstrong: also you still need relations - also a relation between force and its actualization - ArmstrongVs forces
II 152
Force / ArmstrongVsForce/Armstrong: Forces point "behind themselves".

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

In
Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

AR III
D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983


> Counter arguments against Armstrong



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-24