Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Chisholm, Roderick M.
 
Books on Amazon
Criteria Chisholm II M.David/L. Stubenberg (Hg) Philosophische Aufsätze zu Ehren von R.M. Chisholm Graz 1986

II 3-15
Criterion/David: the criterion e.g. for good/bad apples is not itself an apple, but for propositions it is a proposition. ChisholmVs: it does not have to be a proposition.
Epistemology: A what do we know?
B: how do we decide whether we know anything?
Parikularism: from A to B
Methodism: from B to A
Criterion: need not be explicit knowledge.
Vs: circular if the crit. relies on the list A.
VsVs: need not be a finished list - actual argue whether a complete theory must be at the beginning. No one can start with single examples, but:
Methodism: solution: the good apples are the ones that have no stains - and thus A and B fall together.
Particularism: in better position: just start, we do not need a principle.

Chi I
R. Chisholm
Die erste Person Frankfurt 1992

Chi III
Roderick M. Chisholm
Erkenntnistheorie Graz 2004


> Counter arguments against Chisholm



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX file
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-04-23