Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
 
Books on Amazon
Logical Form Hintikka I 80
Logical Form/Tractatus/Wittgenstein/Hintikka: the objects are constitutive of the logical forms of atomic sentences - the complex shapes are not independent objects - form of the object: what is a priori true of it - determines the connectability -> compositionality.
---
IV 25
Logical Form/Tractatus/Wittgenstein: we get it when we transform all arbitrary characters into variables - it depends only on the nature of the sentence, not arbitrariness - this class corresponds to the logical form.
---
Tetens VII 133
Predication/Logical Form/Tractatus/Tetens: a) "the object A has the property F " ((s) predication), Fa) - b) "any object with property F, also has the property G" ((s) Universal quantification (x) (Fx> Gx)).

W II
L. Wittgenstein
Vorlesungen 1930-35 Frankfurt 1989

W III
L. Wittgenstein
Das Blaue Buch - Eine Philosophische Betrachtung Frankfurt 1984

W IV
L. Wittgenstein
Tractatus Logico Philosophicus Frankfurt/M 1960

Hin I
Jaakko and Merrill B. Hintikka
The Logic of Epistemology and the Epistemology of Logic Dordrecht 1989

W I
J. Hintikka/M. B. Hintikka
Untersuchungen zu Wittgenstein Frankfurt 1996

Te I
H. Tetens
Geist, Gehirn, Maschine Stuttgart 1994

W VII
H. Tetens
Tractatus - Ein Kommentar Stuttgart 2009


> Counter arguments against Wittgenstein



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-25