Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Logical proper name: e.g. this, that. According to B. Russell's earlier theory, they are the only real names. Logical proper names are not the same as demonstratives. See also acquaintance ,demonstratives.
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Strawson, Peter F.
 
Books on Amazon
Logical Proper Names VII 111
Logical proper names / StrawsonVsRussell: "This" is no log pr. name: one must know what the phrase means in order to respond to it
Tugendhat I 387/388
Logical proper names / StrawsonVsRussell: log.pr.n. are merely fictional, no ambiguous name but a deictic expression, it has a uniform meaning and shall refer to different objects (according to the use in different situations) - TugendhatVsRussell: overlooks the fact that the same objects may also be referred to by other terms - TugendhatVsStrawson: overlooked the fact that he himself presupposed Russell’s theory.

Str I
P.F. Strawson
Einzelding und logisches Subjekt Stuttgart 1972

Str IV
P.F. Strawson
Analyse und Metaphysik München 1994

Str V
P.F. Strawson
Die Grenzen des Sinns Frankfurt 1981

Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

Tu II
E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992


> Counter arguments against Strawson



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-27