Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Armstrong, D.M.
Books on Amazon
Natural Laws III 137
Laws of Nature/LoN/Natural Law/Science/Form/Identification/Armstrong: theoretical identification of water and H2O not a law of nature - two all-quantifications on molecules and water - each law of nature must have double-digit form of premise-conclusion - Ontology: what entities exist is inextricably linked with law of nature - but also distinguishable from it.
III 158
LoN/Armstrong: contingent - but not because they are discovered - the distinction a priori/a posteriori an epistemic one.
II 17
LoN/Armstrong: not true statements of law, but truth-makers - VsHume: strong LoN: contain regularities, but cannot be reduced to them (because dispositions do not always show) - LoN: can be identified with relations between universals (properties) - Camp: realistic view - E.g. possession of a property leads to possession of another property - LoN/Armstrong: contingent! - But the regularity seems to be contained analytically.
II 25
LoN/Armstrong: Relation between categorical properties (not dispositional ones) - PlaceVs: smuggles modality in (because the relations then have to be intentional or modal).
III 44
LoN/Armstrong: no causal factors - exists only when instantiated - logical consequence (that three values ​​of volume, pressure, temperature always are connected) is not because of the law! (Boyle's law is no law of nature).

AR II = Disp
D. M. Armstrong

Dispositions, Tim Crane, London New York 1996

D. Armstrong
What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge 1983

> Counter arguments against Armstrong

back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-27