Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Goodman, Nelson
 
Books on Amazon
Nominalism I 118
Even though my system only speaks of individuals and excludes classes, it can perceive arbitrary as an individual. The nominalistic prohibition is directed against the uncontrolled proliferation of entities on any selected individuals basis, but leaves the choice of the basis completely open. It thus allows alternative versions.
---
I 119
While the doctrine of physicalists: "No difference without physical difference" and the doctrine of the nominalists: "No difference without distinction of individuals", sound the same, they differ significantly.
(VsPhysicalism: only allows one basis but which is not clear at all.)
---
A propos III 76
Nominalism/Goodman: places great importance on the etiquette: a nominalist order. What reverence one may have before classes, classes are not moved from sphere to sphere, and attributes are certainly not abstracted from some objects and injected into another.

G I
N. Goodman
Weisen der Welterzeugung Frankfurt 1984

G II
N. Goodman
Tatsache Fiktion Voraussage Frankfurt 1988

G III
N. Goodman
Sprachen der Kunst Frankfurt 1997

G IV
N. Goodman/K. Elgin
Revisionen Frankfurt 1989


> Counter arguments against Goodman
> Counter arguments in relation to Nominalism



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-23