Books on Amazon
Even though my system only speaks of individuals and excludes classes, it can perceive arbitrary as an individual. The nominalistic prohibition is directed against the uncontrolled proliferation of entities on any selected individuals basis, but leaves the choice of the basis completely open. It thus allows alternative versions.
While the doctrine of physicalists: "No difference without physical difference" and the doctrine of the nominalists: "No difference without distinction of individuals", sound the same, they differ significantly.
(VsPhysicalism: only allows one basis but which is not clear at all.)
A propos III 76
Nominalism/Goodman: places great importance on the etiquette: a nominalist order. What reverence one may have before classes, classes are not moved from sphere to sphere, and attributes are certainly not abstracted from some objects and injected into another.
Weisen der Welterzeugung Frankfurt 1984
Tatsache Fiktion Voraussage Frankfurt 1988
Sprachen der Kunst Frankfurt 1997
N. Goodman/K. Elgin
Revisionen Frankfurt 1989