Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Wiggins, David
 
Books on Amazon
Ontology EMD II 322
Ontology/Necessity/Theory T1/Peacocke: we accept the abstractions as unanalyzed predicates for the use in logical axioms and rules of inference - we assume properties not as entities that meet the object language - i.e. not that there is no one - even though the object language has no quantification over objects, a finite treatment of infinitely many singular terms requires an attribution of entities: E.g. denote (Cleopatra) = Cleopatra - the (father of t1) = father of the (t1 ) - Tr (t1 is greater than t2) ↔ den(t1) is greater than den(t2) - (see the original text: underlined: wellformed phrases) - but this identity is needed only if one assumes properties in the object language.

Wigg I
D. Wiggins
Essays on Identity and Substance Oxford 2016

EMD II
G. Evans/J. McDowell
Truth and Meaning Oxford 1977

Ev I
G. Evans
The Varieties of Reference (Clarendon Paperbacks) Oxford 1989


> Counter arguments against Wiggins
> Counter arguments in relation to Ontology



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-25