Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Brandom, Robert
 
Books on Amazon
Paratactic Analysis I 743
Paratactic analysis/Davidson: 1. focuses on Tokenings, not on types.
---
I 744
2. an exposed sentence tokening should stand in relation to the one that is attributed.
---
I 745
3. essential relation of "equal speech" - problem: the substitution in the range of "that" does not preserve the truth value of the entire attribution. - Solution: the sentence-tokening located within, is not part of the actual attribution. - BrandomVsDavidson: the relation between the two Tokenings should be an anaphor and not demonstrative. - e.g. Galileo said (something in his mouth that commited him on that, what an assertive utterance of the following in my mouth would now commit me to).

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begr√ľnden und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001


> Counter arguments against Brandom
> Counter arguments in relation to Paratactic Analysis



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX file
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-04-30