Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Tugendhat, Ernst
 
Books on Amazon
Propositional Content I 74
Propositional content/Tugendhat: E.g. what is common of: "he comes", "he would come"," "if he would come", "does he come?" - Understanding: has always the structure of yes/no responses to propositional content - no propositional content: E.g. "hurray", "thank you", "good day".
---
I 241
Propositional content/Searle/Tugendhat: Searle uses "p" not for the assertoric sentence, but for the propositional content (Tugendhat: just as I used [p]) - who uses 'p' according to Searle wants to say that the fact that p really exists. - TugendhatVsSearle: unclear what facts actually are and how to recognize them - Tugendhat instead: the question of what is an assertion may be nothing more than the question according to which rules this action is completed.
---
I 290
Propositional content/Tugendhat. = Alleged - has no truth condition- propositional content is not the sentence.

Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

Tu II
E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992


> Counter arguments against Tugendhat



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-26