Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Tugendhat, Ernst
 
Books on Amazon
Redundancy Theory I 252
Redundancy theory / Tugendhat: there is a surplus in the expression ’p’ incomparison to the incomplete expression ’that p’ - it is this plus that the addition of ’is true’ expressed - that is not at all trivial. - It would be trivial if one presupposes that one already understands the use of assertoric sentences - "true" can be eliminated - (Tugendhat per redundancy theory)
I 266
TugendhatVsredundancy theory: if truth is necessary for determining the meaning of a sentence (by truth conditions), then "true" should not be eliminable.
I 315
Redundancy theory / Tugendhat: presupposes that the difference between ("it is said") "that p" and "p" is already understood.

Tu I
E. Tugendhat
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Sprachanalytische Philosophie Frankfurt 1976

Tu II
E. Tugendhat
Philosophische Aufsätze Frankfurt 1992


> Counter arguments against Tugendhat
> Counter arguments in relation to Redundancy Theory



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-23