Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Rorty, Richard
Books on Amazon:
Richard Rorty
Regress I 255
Regress / Malcolm: (according to Rorty): models for conformity generate regresses: if you are asked, how do you know e.g. that the seen dog agrees with the idea of a dog, one must ask how do you know that it’s a case of conformity.
I 255
Ryle: Here you have to be satisfied with the sentence, "he sees it." Nothing "Para Mechanical" can improve our understanding of perceptual recognition. > Fodor, > perception.
I 264
Regress / Rorty: the argument of duplication is simply due to a bad question. (VsMalcolm and Ryle "How is motion possible?" "Why does nature follow natural laws?" (How-is-it-possible-questions).

Ro I
R. Rorty
Der Spiegel der Natur Frankfurt 1997

R. Rorty
Philosophie & die Zukunft Frankfurt 2000

R. Rorty
Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität Frankfurt 1992

R. Rorty
Eine Kultur ohne Zentrum Stuttgart 1993

Ro V
R. Rorty
Solidarität oder Objektivität? Stuttgart 1998

R. Rorty
Wahrheit und Fortschritt Frankfurt 2000

> Counter arguments against Rorty
> Counter arguments in relation to Regress

back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-29