Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Representation, philosophy: representations are adopted internal conditions, such as visual imaginations or linguistic completions, which set in as associations or are possibly developed by reconstruction. In a wider sense, sentences, words, and symbols are representations within a character system. See also truth maker, idea, sentences, propositions, intensions, correspondence, speech act theory._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
St. Pinker on Representation - Dictionary of Arguments
I 112 Representation/Pinker: is necessary for generalizations. >Generalization, >Generality. I 117 At least four forms: 1) visual image 2) phonetic figure 3) grammatical representation 4) mentalese, conceptual knowledge (empirically demonstrated by associations) >Grammar, >Syntax, >Mentalese/Languge of thought, >Association. With a single type of representation it would be more complicated: we would need a hierarchy. >Hierarchy._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Pi I St. Pinker How the Mind Works, New York 1997 German Edition: Wie das Denken im Kopf entsteht München 1998 |
||
> Counter arguments against Pinker
> Counter arguments in relation to Representation
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-19