Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Davidson, Donald
 
Books on Amazon
Incorrigibility Frank I 637
Incorrigibility / DavidsonVsRorty: our claims about our own propositional attitudes are not incorrigible - it is possible that our self-judgments be overturned by clues and evidence that are available to others -
I 644
I. / Shoemaker: not a kind of knowledge, but a class of utterances (not propositions as meanings) - DavidsonVs: that is not enough: the speaker must know that it is this particular class of sentences he used - problem: if only the speaker himself can decide that, then there is absolutely no basis.

D I
D. Davidson
Der Mythos des Subjektiven Stuttgart 1993

D III
D. Davidson
Handlung und Ereignis Frankfurt 1990

D IV
D. Davidson
Wahrheit und Interpretation Frankfurt 1990

Fra I
M. Frank (Hrsg.)
Analytische Theorien des Selbstbewusstseins Frankfurt 1994


> Counter arguments against Davidson
> Counter arguments in relation to Incorrigibility



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX file
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-04-26