Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Tarski, Alfred
Books on Amazon
Consistency Berka I 401
Consistency Proof/Gödel: cannot be performed if the meta language does not contain higher type variables - Undecidability: is eliminated when the examined theory (OS) is enriched with higher type variables
Berka I 474f
Consistency/Logical Form/Tarski: is present when - for any statement x - either x e FL(X) or ~x e FL(X). (sic) - (s) either x is not an inference from the system or its negation is not an inference - but: completeness/complete: accordingly: if - for any statement x - either x e FL(X) or ~x e FL(X) - (s) if either any statement or its negation is an inference from the system)
I 529 f
Law of Contradiction/Tarski: "x ~e contradiction or ~x ~e contradiction" - Point: we cannot make any generalization from the class of these statement functions! The generalization of these statement functions would itself be a (general) statement, namely the of the SvW - Problem: infinite logical product that cannot be derived with normal methods of inference.
I 531
Solution: "rule of infinite induction" - (differs from all other rules of inference by infinitist character)

Tarsk I
A. Tarski
Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923-38 Indianapolis 1983

Brk I
K. Berka/L. Kreiser
Logik Texte Berlin 1983

> Counter arguments against Tarski
> Counter arguments in relation to Consistency

back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-27