Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Brandom, Robert
Books on Amazon
Recognition I 628
Recognition/Repeatability/Brandom: repeatable events are lexical types. But cotypicity is neither necessary nor sufficient, so they are considered as occurrences of the same semantic meaning. Not sufficiently, because the substitution inference is not guaranteed here: not necessary: because the relation between predicates already guarantees the accuracy - e.g. this organism is a mammal, so it is a vertebrate (anaphora) - required: recognition (reidentifiability)

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begr√ľnden und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001

> Counter arguments against Brandom

> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX file
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-04-29