Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Brandom, Robert
 
Books on Amazon
Knowledge Definition knowledge: justified true beliefs - must be caused in the right way. - (Goldman) - (Gettier)
I 321
Knowledge: in order for the token "that is green" to express knowledge, one must not only have a symptom of the presence, but one must also know that this token is a symptom of the presence.
---
I 322
Justification: it presupposes - BrandomVsSellars: it presupposes that the reporter has to justify himself.
---
I 715/6
Knowledge/Brandom: 1) the one who knows must assign an inferentially structured, propositionally substantial definition (belief condition) - 2) assign an inheritable authorization for this definition - 3) the account holder must accept the same propositional definition that is assigned.
---
II 127
Knowledge/Plato: true opinion plus logical explanation is necessary.
---
II 129
Knowledge/Reliability theory/Brandom: one could believe that p without believing that one knows that p - because a belief is a different precondition of knowledge, it follows that if one does not even believe that one knows that p, then one does not know that one knows.

Bra I
R. Brandom
Expressive Vernunft Frankfurt 2000

Bra II
R. Brandom
Begr√ľnden und Begreifen Frankfurt 2001


> Counter arguments against Brandom
> Counter arguments in relation to Knowledge



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX Datei
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-05-01