Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Fine, Kit
 
Books on Amazon
Ontology Rorty VI 172
Arthur Fine, "natural ontological attitude": one should not answer such questions. You should have no great ontological bonds. FineVsDennett: let us not talk about the "furniture of the physical world". No one would ask "How real is this". (Rorty ditto).

Fin I
K. Fine
The Limits of Abstraction Oxford 2008

FinA I
A. Fine
The Shaky Game (Science and Its Conceptual Foundations series) Chicago 1996

Ro I
R. Rorty
Der Spiegel der Natur Frankfurt 1997

Ro II
R. Rorty
Philosophie & die Zukunft Frankfurt 2000

Ro III
R. Rorty
Kontingenz, Ironie und Solidarität Frankfurt 1992

Ro IV
R. Rorty
Eine Kultur ohne Zentrum Stuttgart 1993

Ro V
R. Rorty
Solidarität oder Objektivität? Stuttgart 1998

Ro VI
R. Rorty
Wahrheit und Fortschritt Frankfurt 2000


> Counter arguments against Fine
> Counter arguments in relation to Ontology



> Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction | > Export as BibTeX file
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-04-26