## Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments | |||

Author | Item | Excerpt | Meta data |
---|---|---|---|

Hilbert, D. Books on Amazon |
Finiteness | Thiel I 245 Finite/Hilbert: in the sense of Hilbert, it is only a question of how statements about infinite objects can be justified by means of "finite" methods. Hilbert found the finiteness in the "operational" method, especially of the combinatorics, arithmetics, and elemental algebra already exemplarily realized. They were "genetically" (constructively) built up into the second third of the 19th century, while the construction of geometry was a prime example for the axiomatic structure of a discipline. --- I 246 Each finite operation is an area that is manageable for the person who is acting. This area can change during the process. --- I 247 The fact that the arithmetic functions required for Gödel's proof are even primitively recursive (I 232) is remarkable in that not all effectively computable functions are primitively recursive, and the primitive recursive functions are a true subclass of the computable functions. --- I 248 An effectively computable, but not primitive, recursive function is e.g. explained by the following scheme for the calculation of their values (not proved) (x 'is the successor of x): ψ(0,n) = n' ψ(m',0) = ψ(m,1) ψ(m',n')= ψ(m,ψ(m',n)). (I 247) --- I 248 If one wants to approach the general concept of comprehensibility, one has to accept the so-called μ operator as a new means of expression. --- Thiel I 249 Computability/Church/Thiel: how close is this to a concept of "general computability"? There is the concept of "turing computability" of the "I definability at Church, the "canonical systems" at post. Each function, which is in one of these classes, is also demonstrable in the others. Church: has then uttered the presumption that with this an adequate clarification of the general concept of computability is achieved. ("Church Thesis"). But it means that this is an "non-mathematical" presumption, and is not capable of any mathematical proof. An intuitive term. Whether such a specification is "adequate" cannot be answered with mathematical means. --- I 250 Apart from finiteness and constructivity, there remain other questions: none of the definitions for the offered functional classes is finite: (e.g. μ-recursive functions). The attempt to describe effective executability with classical means remains questionable, but if we interpret the existence quantifier constructively, we have already assumed the concept of constructivity. |
T I Chr. Thiel Philosophie und Mathematik Darmstadt 1995 |

> Counter arguments against **Hilbert**

back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction

Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-25