Philosophy Lexicon of Arguments

Search  
 
Author Item Excerpt Meta data
Hintikka, J.
 
Books on Amazon
Relevance I 143
Relevance/Identification/Cross-World Identity/Possible Worlds/Hintikka: Question: What are the relevant worlds that need to be considered in the perception-like identification?
Solution: all worlds need to be considered that are compatible with what the subject perceives.
Knowledge/belief/Hintikka: etc. corresponding: the relevant worlds are always those that are compatible with the knowledge, the beliefs, etc. of the subject.
For example, compatible with the distribution of objects in the field of vision.
(S) VsHintikka: 1. these worlds cannot possibly all be relevant.
2. The distribution of the objects can be different, without the stimuli being different: E.g. swapped eggs, exchanged seating etc.

Hin I
Jaakko and Merrill B. Hintikka
The Logic of Epistemology and the Epistemology of Logic Dordrecht 1989

W I
J. Hintikka/M. B. Hintikka
Untersuchungen zu Wittgenstein Frankfurt 1996


> Counter arguments against Hintikka



back to list view | > Suggest your own contribution | > Suggest a correction
 
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2017-03-24