Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Utterance: oral performance of a sentence as opposed to the mere thinking or writing. See also actions, speech acts utterance conditions, assertibility conditions_____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
P. Hungerland on Utterances - Dictionary of Arguments
I 290 Utterances/modification/Austin/principle: there is no modification without deviation! HungerlandVsAustin: there is another sense of "normal". E.g "I sit quite normally in the chair". Here, I cannot say that I was sitting intentionally in the chair, or that I was sitting unintentionally in the chair. I 292 HungerlandVsAustin: we use modifiers when there is a reason to summon a norm, a benchmark or a scale. For example, a clergyman who is not a clergyman because he is a swindler is not a special kind of clergyman, he is not a clergyman at all._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Hungerland I Isabel C. Hungerland Contextual Implication, Inquiry, 3/4, 1960, pp. 211-258 In Handlung, Kommunikation, Bedeutung, Georg Meggle, Frankfurt/M. 1979 |
||
> Counter arguments against Hungerland
> Counter arguments in relation to Utterances
Ed. Martin Schulz, access date 2024-04-17