Philosophy Dictionary of ArgumentsHome | |||
| |||
R. Chisholm - Philosophy Dictionary of Arguments | |||
Demonstratives: E.g. this, that, that one. Problems in language use arise because of lack of clarity when referring back to prior description. - In logic there is a missing expressibility of uniqueness. See also anaphora, deixis, relations, logical proper names, index words, indexicality, iota operator._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
Author | Item | More concepts for author | |
---|---|---|---|
Brandom, Robert | Demonstratives | Brandom | |
Carnap, Rudolf | Demonstratives | Carnap | |
Castaneda, Hector-Neri | Demonstratives | Castaneda | |
Chisholm, Roderick | Demonstratives | Chisholm | |
Field, Hartry | Demonstratives | Field | |
Kripke, Saul A. | Demonstratives | Kripke | |
Nozick, Robert | Demonstratives | Nozick | |
Peacocke, Christopher | Demonstratives | Peacocke | |
Russell, Bertrand | Demonstratives | Russell | |
Shoemaker, Sydney | Demonstratives | Shoemaker | |
Stalnaker, Robert | Demonstratives | Stalnaker | |
Tugendhat, E. | Demonstratives | Tugendhat | |
|