John Rawls on Deliberative Democracy - Dictionary of Arguments
Gaus I 146
Deliberative democray/Rawls/Dryzek: Some deliberative liberals are not especially democratic. Notably, Rawls in the end wants to entrust deliberation to experts in public reason such as Supreme Court justices, who only need to deliberate in the personal as opposed to the interactive sense of the word (see Goodin, 2000(1), for an explicit defence of personal as opposed to interactive deliberation).
This is justified because Rawls believes public reason is unitary, accessible in the same terms by any reflective individual, and thus best accessible by the most qualified individual(s). >Deliberative Democray/Dryzek, >Democracy/Social Choice Theory.
(1) Goodin, Robert E. (2000) 'Democratic deliberation within'. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29:81—109.
Dryzek, John S. 2004. „Democratic Political Theory“. In: Gaus, Gerald F. & Kukathas, Chandran 2004. Handbook of Political Theory. SAGE Publications_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition.
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition Oxford 2005
Gerald F. Gaus
Handbook of Political Theory London 2004