Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Reputation: Reputation is the general opinion or esteem in which someone or something is held, in the view of others. See also Recognition, Society, Community, Intersubjectivity, Authority, Fashion._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Jeff Jarvis on Reputation - Dictionary of Arguments
Morozov I 241 Reputation/Jarvis/Morozov: Jarvis' thesis: "The way you can influence your reputation is often to share more, not less. The best solution is to be yourself. If that bothers you, talk to your psychiatrist. Even better, blog about it."(1) MorozovVsJarvis: but what if your insurance company starts reading your blogs? Will you be able to cope with the restrictions Jarvis does not talk about that. 1. Jeff Jarvis, Public Parts: How Sharing in the Digital Age Improves the Way We Work and Live (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2011), p. 131._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Jarvis I Jeff Jarvis What Would Google Do?: Reverse-Engineering the Fastest Growing Company in the History of the World New York 2011 Jarvis II Jeff Jarvis Public Parts: How Sharing in the Digital Age Improves the Way We Work and Live New York 2011 Morozov I Evgeny Morozov To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism New York 2014 |
||
> Counter arguments against Jarvis
> Counter arguments in relation to Reputation
