Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome | |||
| |||
Equivalence: Relation between sentences. It exists if both sides have the same truth value, so that they are both true or both false._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Logic Texts on Equivalence - Dictionary of Arguments
Hoyningen-Huene II 131 Biconditional/Hoyningen-Huene: ↔ is a sign of metalogic - logical equivalence is a statement linking of the object language. Cf. >Meta language, >Object language, >Levels(order). II 133 Equivalence/Hoyningen-Huene: is weakening the identity of statements. Equivalent statements are not in all respects the same, but only in a logical sense - both have always the same truth values. Equivalent formulas have the same inference sets - and they can be inferred from the same conditions. >Truth value, cf. >Implication, >Conditions. _____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Logic Texts Me I Albert Menne Folgerichtig Denken Darmstadt 1988 HH II Hoyningen-Huene Formale Logik, Stuttgart 1998 Re III Stephen Read Philosophie der Logik Hamburg 1997 Sal IV Wesley C. Salmon Logic, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1973 - German: Logik Stuttgart 1983 Sai V R.M.Sainsbury Paradoxes, Cambridge/New York/Melbourne 1995 - German: Paradoxien Stuttgart 2001 |