Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Method: a method is a procedure agreed on by participants of a discussion or research project. In the case of violations of a method, the comparability of the results is in particular questioned, since these no longer come from a set with uniformly defined properties of the elements._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maggie Bruck on Method - Dictionary of Arguments
Slater I 106 Method/suggestibility/Ceci/Bruck: Ceci and Bruck (1993)(1) pointed to the differential methodologies in the stress and memory research as a likely reason for the conflicting results – a valid point. One potentially helpful recent differentiation of the methods in child witness research on distress and memory concerns the stressful nature of the stimulus versus the traumatic background of the participants (Goodman, Quas, & Ogle, 2010)(2). >Psychological stress, >Memory. In some studies, the to-be-remembered information is distressing, but the participants may have no known maltreatment history (e.g., Goodman et al., 1997(3); Merritt et al., 1994(4)). In other studies, the memories under examination may be for neutral or mildly positive information (e.g., interactions with adults), but the participants may have been maltreated during childhood (Chae, Goodman, Eisen, & Qin, in press; Goodman, Bottoms, Rudy, Davis, & Schwartz-Kenney, 2001(5)). 1. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403–439. 2. Goodman, G. S., Quas, J. A., & Ogle, C. M. (2010). Child maltreatment and memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 325–351. 3. Goodman, G. S., Quas, J. A., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Riddlesberger, M. M., & Kuhn, J. (1997). Children’s reactions to and memory for a stressful event: Influence of age, anatomical dolls, knowledge, and parental attachment. Applied Developmental Science, 1, 54–75. 4. Merritt, K. A., Ornstein, P. A., & Spicker, B. (1994). Children’s memory for a salient medical procedure: Implications for testimony. Pediatrics, 94, 17–23. 5. Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Rudy, L., Davis, S. L., & Schwartz-Kenney, B. M. (2001). Effects of past abuse experiences on children’s eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 269–298. Kelly McWilliams, Daniel Bederian-Gardner, Sue D. Hobbs, Sarah Bakanosky, and Gail S. Goodman, „Children’s Eyewitness Memory and Suggestibility. Revisiting Ceci and Bruck’s (1993) Review“, in: Alan M. Slater & Paul C. Quinn (eds.) 2012. Developmental Psychology. Revisiting the Classic Studies. London: Sage Publications_____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Bruck, Maggie Slater I Alan M. Slater Paul C. Quinn Developmental Psychology. Revisiting the Classic Studies London 2012 |
||
