Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Simplicity philosophy: is not definable. E.g. One could try to define the simplicity of an object by the fact that the subject requires the shortest description. This is bound to fail, because the symbols used in the description in turn may refer to complex entities. See also unity, complexity, descriptions._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Baruch Spinoza on Simplicity - Dictionary of Arguments
Holz I 38 Simplicity/Spinoza: the simple exists in the world only once, as the substance. Substance/LeibnizVsSpinoza: the world is the infinite manifoldness of simple substances, about which there can be an infinite set of statements. >Substance, >Substance/Spinoza, >G.W. Leibniz, >World, >Order, >World/Thinking, >Reality, cf. >Complexity._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Spinoza I B. Spinoza Spinoza: Complete Works Indianapolis 2002 Holz I Hans Heinz Holz Leibniz Frankfurt 1992 Holz II Hans Heinz Holz Descartes Frankfurt/M. 1994 |
||
> Counter arguments against Spinoza
> Counter arguments in relation to Simplicity
