Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Equivalence: Relation between sentences. It exists if both sides have the same truth value, so that they are both true or both false._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Rainer Stuhlmann-Laeisz on Equivalence - Dictionary of Arguments
SL I 6 Equivalences/modal logic/Stuhlmann-Laeisz: relationship between operators - E.g. necessary: not possible that ~ a - offered: if not allowed that a ~ - believed: if not thought possible that ~ a. - Will always be the case: if not once the case that ~ a. >Modal logic, >Epistemic logic, >Modalities, >Operators, >Possibility, >Necessity, >Belief, >Facts._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
SL I R. Stuhlmann Laeisz Philosophische Logik Paderborn 2002 Stuhlmann II R. Stuhlmann-Laeisz Freges Logische Untersuchungen Darmstadt 1995 |
||
> Counter arguments against Stuhlmann-Laeisz
> Counter arguments in relation to Equivalence
